Parallel Analysis

Verified

Psychometrics (legacy hub)

Independently verified. Every statistic this test reports has been re-derived against an independent reference — never the library the pipeline itself calls — the rendered output was read back in a browser, and the result is locked with a committed regression suite.

Run this test straight away on a free built-in teaching dataset — no data of your own needed — or bring your own. Either opens the guided workspace: variable setup, assumption diagnostics, results with effect sizes and confidence intervals, figures, and APA-ready reporting.

Loading teaching datasets…

Or use your own dataset

Loading your datasets…

Determines how many factors to retain in EFA by comparing the eigenvalues of the observed correlation matrix to the eigenvalues of correlation matrices from RANDOM data with the same n × k shape.

Retain factors whose observed eigenvalue exceeds the 95th-percentile (or mean) random eigenvalue. Reports the recommended number of factors, scree plot with random-data overlay, and per-factor observed-vs-random eigenvalue table. Widely regarded as the most accurate factor-retention method (Zwick & Velicer 1986); supersedes Kaiser's eigenvalue-> 1 rule and visual scree-plot inspection.

Worked example

How many factors should we retain?

Horn's parallel analysis compares observed eigenvalues to those from random data — retain factors whose eigenvalue beats the random benchmark.

Result

Three observed eigenvalues exceeded the 95th-percentile random values, supporting a three-factor solution.

How you'd report it (APA)

Parallel analysis supported retaining three factors.

When to use it

  • Pre-EFA factor-count determination (default use)
    30-item personality questionnaire on n=500.
  • Comparison with Kaiser / MAP / scree as a robustness check
    Item analysis on n=300, k=20.

When NOT to — use instead

  • Single-factor scale (no question of how many factors)
    Parallel analysis is for determining factor count when unknown. → Exploratory FA
  • Confirmatory factor analysis with pre-specified factor count
    PA is exploratory. → Confirmatory FA
  • Sample too small (n < 5 × k)
    PA needs adequate sample for both observed and random eigenvalue stability. → KMO + Bartlett
  • Reliability assessment (not factor count)
    PA is about retaining factors. → Cronbach's Alpha

Assumptions (and what to do if they fail)

Items measured on a continuous / Likert scalemedium

Check: See the assumption diagnostics in the workspace.

If violated: The workspace flags this and suggests a robust or nonparametric alternative.

Correlation matrix is positive-definitemedium

Check: See the assumption diagnostics in the workspace.

If violated: The workspace flags this and suggests a robust or nonparametric alternative.

Random-data simulations use the same n and p as the observed datamedium

Check: See the assumption diagnostics in the workspace.

If violated: The workspace flags this and suggests a robust or nonparametric alternative.

Listwise exclusion of incomplete response setsmedium

Check: See the assumption diagnostics in the workspace.

If violated: The workspace flags this and suggests a robust or nonparametric alternative.

Ready to run a Parallel Analysis on your own data?

Guided setup, automatic assumption checks, effect sizes, figures and an APA write-up.

Run this test →